Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Rent Control Petition. No. 01/2024

Case between Ummayyakutty. N et al vs Prabhakaran Kummayi regarding Rent Control

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha.T.P
Order Date
2025-12-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners are family members represented by Ummayyakutty. N, seeking to address a rent control issue with the respondent, Prabhakaran Kummayi. The matter was settled allowing the respondent to continue possession of the property for 11 months with an enhanced rent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the Rent Control Petition, allowing the respondent to continue possession of the property for 11 months.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the Rent Control Petition, allowing the respondent to continue possession of the property for 11 months.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In view of the above statement RCP is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ummayyakutty. N
Party Age
72
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Imbichipathumma
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Khadeeja
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suhara Hassan
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabira
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prabhakaran Kummayi
Party Age
56
Relation
So
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.B. Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Priya. A.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.M. Musthafa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth. U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondent is permitted to continue his possession of the property for 11 months with an enhanced rent.
Evidence:
As per the joint statement matter settled and the respondent is permitted to continue his possession of the property for 11 months from 01.10.2025 with an enhanced rent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ummayyakutty. N et al vs Prabhakaran Kummayi regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Ummayyakutty. N et al vs Prabhakaran Kummayi regarding Rent Control

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
60%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mundoli Abdurasak vs K.P. Assan Koya et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court/Principal Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mattummal Muhammed Hashim vs Safar Ahammed regarding rent control petition
Rent Control Court/Principal Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kedanhoth Mahmood vs K.S.Siyad et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.K. Nazim vs E.K. Nirmalakumari et al regarding Rent Control
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Ramadasan et al vs Ameena Mullaveettil regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court/Principal Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won