R C P No.73/2022

Case between Kedanhoth Mahmood vs K.S.Siyad et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court

Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II

Judge

Smt. Meera John.K

Order Date

2025-01-17

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kedanhoth Mahmood filed a petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 against K.S.Siyad and others. The court allowed the petition based on a joint statement filed by the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The petition was allowed based on the joint statement filed by the parties.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The court allowed the petition based on the joint statement.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court allowed the petition based on the joint statement.

Supporting Evidence

The court allowed the petition based on the joint statement filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is allowed interms of joint statement. Joint statement shall form part of the order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kedanhoth Mahmood
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: K.S.Siyad
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: K.S. Saleem
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P.V. Jameela
Party Age: 52
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Joy Abraham
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.P.S.Murali
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Petition is allowed in terms of joint statement.

Evidence:

Petition is allowed interms of joint statement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification