Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 97/2024

Case between UCO Bank vs Rajeena. S. regarding loan repayment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

UCO Bank filed a suit against Rajeena. S. for the recovery of loan amount due to default. The court found in favor of the plaintiff bank as the defendant failed to appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, allowing UCO Bank to recover the amount of `1,58,978/- along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
`1,58,978/- with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, allowing UCO Bank to recover the amount of `1,58,978/- along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff bank has established its entitlement to the claimed amount as the defendant did not contest the matter.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff bank has established its entitlement to the claimed amount as the defendant did not contest the matter.
Supporting Evidence
This court is of the view that the plaintiff bank has established that the plaintiff bank is entitled to realize the amount claimed in the suit with interest.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff is entitled to realize `1,58,978/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Seventy Eight only) with 12% interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter 6% interest till the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UCO Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeena. S.
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, loan sanction letter, loan agreement, hypothecation deed, demand promissory note, waiver letter, advocate notice, postal receipt, statement of account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. H. Sumanas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Suresh Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount claimed.
Evidence:
the plaintiff bank has established that the plaintiff bank is entitled to realize the amount claimed in the suit
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
the defendant can be directed to pay costs of the proceeding to the plaintiff

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant for loan approval.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter confirming the loan sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement outlining the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Hypothecation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document securing the loan with collateral.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Note acknowledging the loan obligation of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Waiver Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document waiving certain rights or conditions.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant regarding loan recovery.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt confirming the sending of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the account transactions and outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between UCO Bank vs Rajeena. S. regarding loan repayment
Case Code Year
Case between UCO Bank vs Rajeena. S. regarding loan repayment

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Mon, 10/17/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between UCO Bank, Varkala Branch represented by Manager vs Suhitha. T. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Sumesh et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank (United Commercial Bank) vs Ajimol.A et al regarding education loan recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Shemi M., Mohandas regarding recovery of loan amount
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd. vs Ananthu Satheesan et al regarding recovery of loan amount
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won