Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 76/2024

Case between UCO Bank (United Commercial Bank) vs Ajimol.A et al regarding education loan recovery

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-06-17
Duration
approximately-10 months
Case Closed
Tue, 06/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

UCO Bank has filed a suit against Ajimol.A and others for the recovery of an education loan amounting to `2,49,668.72 with interest. The defendants have not appeared in court, leading to an ex parte judgment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover `2,49,668.72 along with interest from the defendants. Costs of the suit are also to be paid by the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
`2,49,668.72 with 12% interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter 6% interest till the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover `2,49,668.72 along with interest from the defendants. Costs of the suit are also to be paid by the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their entitlement to the claimed amount through evidentiary submissions and the lack of contest from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their entitlement to the claimed amount through evidentiary submissions and the lack of contest from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the materials, this court is of the view that the plaintiff bank has established that the plaintiff bank is entitled to realize the amount claimed in the suit with interest.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize `2,49,668.72/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty Nine Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty Eight and Seventy two paise only) with 12% interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter 6% interest till the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UCO Bank (United Commercial Bank)
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajimol.A
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mubeena
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nasar
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, loan sanction letter, education loan agreement, promissory note, waiver letter, guarantee agreement, rescheduling agreement, acknowledgment of debt, advocate notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. H. Sumanas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted the right to recover the claimed amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to realize `2,49,668.72/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty Nine Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty Eight and Seventy two paise only) with 12% interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter 6% interest till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendants on 22.09.2014 for the education loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sanctioned on 21.11.2014 for the education loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement for Education Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed on 21.11.2014 outlining the loan repayment terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed on 21.11.2014 by the defendants, acknowledging loan repayment obligation.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Waiver Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed on 21.11.2014 by the defendants waiving presentment of the promissory note.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed on 21.11.2014 by the guarantor in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Rescheduling Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed on 26.08.2019 by the first defendant for loan repayment restructuring.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Rescheduling Agreement of Second Defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed on 26.08.2019 for loan repayment restructuring.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment of debt cum security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed on 31.03.2022, acknowledging the debt owed to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued on 05.02.2024 demanding payment to close the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Three postal receipts related to the advocate notice.
Reference:
Ext.A11 (series)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Two postal acknowledgment cards related to the advocate notice.
Reference:
Ext.A12 (series)
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing loan account details for the specified period.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between UCO Bank (United Commercial Bank) vs Ajimol.A et al regarding education loan recovery
Case Code Year
Case between UCO Bank (United Commercial Bank) vs Ajimol.A et al regarding education loan recovery

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Mon, 08/26/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nirmala Simon regarding realization of money
THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank, Varkala Branch represented by Manager vs Suhitha. T. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Sumesh et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Shemi M., Mohandas regarding recovery of loan amount
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd. vs Ananthu Satheesan et al regarding recovery of loan amount
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won