Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 502/2023

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nirmala Simon regarding realization of money

Court
THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration
approximately-11 years 9 months
Case Closed
Tue, 09/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank is the plaintiff seeking to recover a loan amount from Nirmala Simon who has defaulted on repayments. The court found in favor of the bank, granting them the amount owed plus interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of Kerala Gramin Bank, allowing them to recover the dues from Nirmala Simon.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize `82,485/- with 12% interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% interest from the date of decree till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of Kerala Gramin Bank, allowing them to recover the dues from Nirmala Simon.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established that the defendant defaulted on the loan repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established that the defendant defaulted on the loan repayment.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that the plaintiff bank has established that the plaintiff bank is entitled to realize the amount claimed in the suit with interest.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize `82,485/- (Rupees Eighty Two Thousand Four Hundred and Eighty Five only) with 12% interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% interest from the date of decree till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nirmala Simon
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 15/11/2013, Promissory note dated 15/11/2013, Delivery letter to DPN dated 15/11/2013, Acknowledgment of debt dated 15/10/2016, Acknowledgment of debt dated 06/02/2019, Acknowledgment of debt dated 22/02/2021, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Ajayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount claimed with interest.
Evidence:
the plaintiff bank is entitled to realize the amount claimed in the suit with interest.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is granted costs of the suit.
Evidence:
the plaintiff bank can be permitted to realize costs of the proceeding from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as part of the evidence to establish the loan granted to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This promissory note was executed by the defendant as security for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Delivery letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the delivery of the promissory note to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This acknowledgment was used to show the defendant's recognition of the debt as of the specified date.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is another acknowledgment document that helps establish the timeline of the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This acknowledgment also supports the claim that the defendant recognized the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provides a detailed account of the financial transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant to inform them of the debt and the subsequent legal action.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the advocate notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms that the notice sent by the plaintiff was received.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nirmala Simon regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nirmala Simon regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Fri, 11/15/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between UCO Bank, Varkala Branch represented by Manager vs Suhitha. T. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Sumesh et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank (United Commercial Bank) vs Ajimol.A et al regarding education loan recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Shemi M., Mohandas regarding recovery of loan amount
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd. vs Ananthu Satheesan et al regarding recovery of loan amount
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won