Case Summary
The plaintiff, UCO Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, filed a suit against Arun S.L. The court rejected the plaint due to a lack of remitted court fees and no application filed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to not meeting court fee requirements and absence of a filed application.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
The plaint was rejected based on procedural grounds.
Supporting Evidence
Balance court fee not seen remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- UCO Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arun S.L
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R.S. Mohanan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected based on procedural grounds.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between UCO Bank vs Arun S.L regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between UCO Bank vs Arun S.L regarding rejection of plaint