Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1380/2020

Case between Triphoni James, Hamlin James, Heju James vs Mary Lucy, Sebastianose regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh S V
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
approximately-5 years 8 months
Case Closed
Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs Triphoni James, Hamlin James, and Heju James against defendants Mary Lucy and Sebastianose. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and no proof affidavit was filed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and the lack of a proof affidavit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and the lack of a proof affidavit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and did not file necessary documentation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and did not file necessary documentation.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiff was absent and no proof affidavit was filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit stands dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Triphoni James
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o late James Fernandez
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hamlin James
Party Age
25
Relation
D/o Late James Fernandez
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Heju James
Party Age
22
Relation
D/o Late James Fernandez
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Lucy
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o Dora Fernandez
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sebastianose
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o Vincent
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri Vettoor S Prakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri Victor D’ Silva
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Swapna S S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed for default

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Triphoni James, Hamlin James, Heju James vs Mary Lucy, Sebastianose regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Triphoni James, Hamlin James, Heju James vs Mary Lucy, Sebastianose regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 06/03/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won