Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 26/2025

Case between Thottathil Abdul Kalam et al vs E.V. Alikoya regarding rent control petition

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-08-04
Duration
approximately-5 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thottathil Abdul Kalam and Mukkadamannil Ramlabeevi filed a petition against E.V. Alikoya for surrendering possession of leased shop rooms. The petitioners claimed that the respondent has not paid rent and subleased the premises contrary to the agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to surrender the leased shop rooms within one month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondents are directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room within one month.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to surrender the leased shop rooms within one month.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established their case as the respondent did not challenge the evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners established their case as the respondent did not challenge the evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and the documents relied upon her remained unchallenged. As such, I find that the petitioners have established their case and therefore they are entitled to an order as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this petition is allowed under Section 11(3) & 11(4)(i) of KBLR Act are follows: 1) The respondents are hereby directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room within one month from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thottathil Abdul Kalam
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mukkadamannil Ramlabeevi
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
E.V. Alikoya
Party Age
80
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Exts. A1, A2, A3 series, A4 series and A5 were marked.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.M. Subair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.P. Semeera
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Ayisha Misna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondents to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room.
Evidence:
The respondents are hereby directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room within one month from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowing the petitioner to realize costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner can realize the costs from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between Abdul Kalam and E.V. Alikoya for the petition A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between Abdul Kalam and E.V. Alikoya for the petition B schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent by Adv. R.M. Subair to E.V. Alikoya regarding the lease agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3 (Series)
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent by Adv. R.M. Subair to E.V. Alikoya regarding the lease agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the lawyer notices sent.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the lawyer notices sent.
Reference:
Ext.A4(b)
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent by Adv. Faizal P. Mukkam to Adv. R.M. Subair.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Thottathil Abdul Kalam et al vs E.V. Alikoya regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thottathil Abdul Kalam et al vs E.V. Alikoya regarding rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mr.Ferose VP vs Mr.Waseem Thondikodan regarding eviction
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Jubairiya et al vs Valiyaveetu Parambil Hamsakoya regarding eviction from leased shop room
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won