Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 75/2024

Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-01-14
Duration
approximately-1 year 2 days
Case Closed
Tue, 01/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Suresh Kumar and others, seek eviction of the respondent, K.T. Sasidharan, for non-payment of rent. The respondent has defaulted on rent payments since January 2018, and the petitioners request an increase in rent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed, fixing the fair rent for the shop room at Rs. 8,000 per month and ordering the respondent to vacate the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent and fixing fair rent at Rs. 8,000/- per month.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed, fixing the fair rent for the shop room at Rs. 8,000 per month and ordering the respondent to vacate the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioners' claims about rental default and justification for rent increase to be legitimate and unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the petitioners' claims about rental default and justification for rent increase to be legitimate and unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 supported by Exts.A1 series & A2 stands unchallenged. There is nothing on record to believe that the respondent has paid the rent.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and section 5 of the Act as follows: 1) The fair rent of the petition schedule shop room is fixed at Rs.8,000/- per month w.e.f 22.08.2024. 2) That the respondent shall put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within one month from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suresh Kumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valiyaparambath Unnimadhavan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.K. Surendran
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shyni
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.T. Sasidharan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer notice issued by K. B. Sahasranaman, Advocate on behalf of the Suresh Kumar to K.T. Sasidharan, Postal receipt, Unclaimed returned registered envelop with acknowledgment card sent by the Adv. K. B. Sahasranaman to K. T. Sasidharan
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. B. Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and section 5 of the Act as follows: That the respondent shall put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within one month from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Fixing the fair rent of the petition schedule shop room to Rs.8,000/- per month.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and section 5 of the Act as follows: The fair rent of the petition schedule shop room is fixed at Rs.8,000/- per month w.e.f 22.08.2024.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement of the petitioners to realize the costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to realise the costs from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the legal notice issued to the respondent demanding payment of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt related to the legal notice sent to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Unclaimed returned registered envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Unclaimed returned registered envelope with acknowledgment card sent to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 01/10/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Gangadharan regarding eviction and rent enhancement
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr.Ferose VP vs Mr.Waseem Thondikodan regarding eviction
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Jubairiya et al vs Valiyaveetu Parambil Hamsakoya regarding eviction from leased shop room
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won