Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1500/2017

Case between Thomas Joseph vs L. Felsy Kostka regarding declaration of title and possession of property.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-08-19
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months
Case Code No.
1500
Case Closed
Tue, 08/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thomas Joseph is the plaintiff seeking a declaration of title and possession for the scheduled property. L. Felsy Kostka, the defendant, opposes the application to accept a new chief affidavit due to previous defective submissions.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition to accept a new chief affidavit filed by the plaintiff because the earlier affidavit was already accepted and partially cross-examined.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition to accept a new chief affidavit filed by the plaintiff because the earlier affidavit was already accepted and partially cross-examined.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff did not demonstrate a valid reason to substitute the previous affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff did not demonstrate a valid reason to substitute the previous affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
For the aforesaid reasons, I am not inclined to permit the present application seeking to accept a new chief affidavit in place of earlier one.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas Joseph
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
L. Felsy Kostka
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.L.D.Lijo Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Ajitha Vincent
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Application seeking to accept a new chief affidavit in place of the earlier one.
Evidence:
I am not inclined to permit the present application seeking to accept a new chief affidavit in place of earlier one. Hence petition stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won