Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 99/2019

Case between Tharamal Kunhabdulla et al vs Chengota Pilakilodiyil Sukumaran regarding eviction of tenant

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-03-18
Duration
approximately-5 years 9 months
Case Closed
Tue, 03/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Tharamal Kunhabdulla et al, seek eviction of the respondent, Chengota Pilakilodiyil Sukumaran, from a shop room leased for hotel business due to non-payment of rent and alterations made to the property. The case arose after the petitioners' legal heir was impleaded following the original petitioner's death.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed, directing the respondent to surrender the premises within one month, failing which legal processes may be initiated for eviction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule room.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed, directing the respondent to surrender the premises within one month, failing which legal processes may be initiated for eviction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners proved their need for eviction based on non-payment of rent and alterations made to the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners proved their need for eviction based on non-payment of rent and alterations made to the property.
Supporting Evidence
There is no dispute as to the landlord-tenant relationship. PW1 deposed in tune with the averments in the petition... Hence I find that the petitioner has proved his case and therefore he is entitled to an order of eviction as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this petition is allowed. 1) The respondent is hereby directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room within one month from today, failing which the petitioner can get the order executed through the process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tharamal Kunhabdulla
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tharammal Kunhammed
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tharammal Moidu
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chengota Pilakilodiyil Sukumaran
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Kychit entered into between Kunhabdulla and Sukumaran, Cheque for Rs.2,48,000/- issued by Sukumaran in favour of Kunhabdulla, Copy of lawyer notice issued by Adv. K.B. Sivaramakrishnan to Sukumaran.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Jaideep Sigh K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule premises.
Evidence:
Hence I find that the petitioner has proved his case and therefore he is entitled to an order of eviction as prayed for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Cost recovery from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioners can realize the costs from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Kychit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the rental agreement for the petition schedule premises.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued towards partial discharge of rent which was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the respondent regarding unpaid rent and the dishonoured cheque.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt associated with the delivery of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3(b)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Tharamal Kunhabdulla et al vs Chengota Pilakilodiyil Sukumaran regarding eviction of tenant
Case Code Year
Case between Tharamal Kunhabdulla et al vs Chengota Pilakilodiyil Sukumaran regarding eviction of tenant

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 03/18/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mr.Ferose VP vs Mr.Waseem Thondikodan regarding eviction
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Jubairiya et al vs Valiyaveetu Parambil Hamsakoya regarding eviction from leased shop room
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won