Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OP (RCP) NO. 90/2016

Case between Thanupillai vs Shajahan regarding rent control petition

Court
Rent Control Court
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-10-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thanupillai filed a rent control petition against Shajahan. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed due to the petitioner's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition as not pressed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as not pressed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was absent and did not press the memo.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was absent and did not press the memo.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner was absent and the court decided to dismiss the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced in open court on this the 14th day of October, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thanupillai
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shajahan
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memo not pressed, earlier submission of counsel for petitioner.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Muttada C.Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Ganesan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Stalin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Manikantan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as not pressed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Evidence:
considering the earlier submission of counsel for petitioner, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thanupillai vs Shajahan regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thanupillai vs Shajahan regarding rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Noorul Islamic Educational Trust(NIET) vs M/s Acumen Global Private Limited et al regarding a petition.
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Anzar Jamaludeen vs Sukumari.M.L et al regarding production of thumb impression register
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Barbara Thomas vs Sonia Benny regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won