Case Summary
Thampi.P filed a suit against the State Bank of India. The court found the plaintiff absent without representation and dismissed the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Thampi.P was dismissed due to his absence and lack of application.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and no application was filed.
Plaintiff was absent and no application was filed.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and no application was filed.
Plaintiff was absent and no application was filed.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Suit stands included in list for trial today.
Judgment Evidence:
I find no reason to proceed with the suit. Hence suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thampi.P
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Mohan Chacko Eapen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gireesh P. Raja
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit stands dismissed due to plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
As Plaintiff is absent and no application seen filed. I find no reason to proceed with the suit. Hence suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thampi.P vs State Bank of India regarding dismissal of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Thampi.P vs State Bank of India regarding dismissal of the suit.