Case Summary
The case involves the plaintiffs Sushama Balan and others against defendants Muhammed Sabu and others regarding a court fee issue. The plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings, while the defendants were represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the defendants as the plaintiffs were absent and failed to remit the required court fees. Hence, the plaint was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were absent and did not remit the court fees despite multiple opportunities.
The plaintiffs were absent and did not remit the court fees despite multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs were absent and did not remit the court fees despite multiple opportunities.
The plaintiffs were absent and did not remit the court fees despite multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiff was absent, and no balance court fee was remitted even after giving repeated opportunities.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sushama Balan
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sakthi kumar
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Devaraj Hariharan
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dharmaraj Hariharan
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dharsanraj Hariharan
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Sabu
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reji Pillai
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Latheef
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.D.Anil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Beena.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V.Bhuvanendran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.S.Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Saheer.E.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee remitted even after giving repeated opportunities. Hence Plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sushama Balan et al vs Muhammed Sabu et al regarding Court fee issue.
Case Code Year
Case between Sushama Balan et al vs Muhammed Sabu et al regarding Court fee issue.