Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1677/2017

Case between Sureshkumar vs Federic Justus regarding default dismissal

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sureshkumar and Sajith, brought a suit against the defendants, Federic Justus and Giji Justus. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence at the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs did not appear to provide evidence. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs did not appear to provide evidence. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear before the court to present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear before the court to present evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is not present before the court to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sureshkumar
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajith
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Federic Justus @ Balan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Giji Justus
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Bindu.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Lekshmi Sree.G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Manu R Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sureshkumar vs Federic Justus regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Sureshkumar vs Federic Justus regarding default dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won