Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 44/2024

Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs Jayaprakash.T.K regarding enhancement of rent

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri.Vivek.P
Order Date
2025-03-12
Duration
approximately-6 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, landlords, are seeking an enhancement of rent from the respondent, the tenant, who has defaulted in payment since October 2016. The landlords argue that the current rent is significantly lower than the market rate.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, granting them the relief of enhancing the rent to Rs. 8000 per month and directing the respondent to vacate the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Fair rent of the scheduled premise is fixed at Rs. 8000/- per month and the respondent is directed to surrender the vacant possession.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, granting them the relief of enhancing the rent to Rs. 8000 per month and directing the respondent to vacate the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioners justified in seeking rent enhancement based on the prevailing rental rates in the locality.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the petitioners justified in seeking rent enhancement based on the prevailing rental rates in the locality.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 regarding locational importance of the scheduled premises and its growth in recent times stands unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1.The fair rent of the scheduled premise is fixed at Rs. 8000/- per month under Section 5 of KBLR Act with effect from the date of filing of this application. 2.That the respondent is hereby directed to surrender the vacant possession of the petition scheduled premises to the petitioner u/s 11(2)(b) of KBLR Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suresh Kumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valiyaparambath Unnimadhavan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.K.Surendran
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shyni
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayaprakash.T.K
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of legal notice sent by Adv.K.B.Sahasranamam to Jayaprakash.T.K, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.B.Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Muhammed Hussain.K.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Fair rent of the scheduled premises fixed at Rs. 8000/- per month.
Evidence:
In the result, 1. The fair rent of the scheduled premise is fixed at Rs. 8000/- per month under Section 5 of KBLR Act with effect from the date of filing of this application.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to surrender the vacant possession of the petition scheduled premises to the petitioner.
Evidence:
2. That the respondent is hereby directed to surrender the vacant possession of the petition scheduled premises to the petitioner u/s 11(2)(b) of KBLR Act.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution of the order shall not occur before one month.
Evidence:
3. That the order of this court shall not be executed before the expiry of one month from the date of this order as mandated under Section 11(2)(c) of KBLR Act.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner can realize the costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
4. The petitioner can realize the costs from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing that the petitioner complied with Section 11(2) of KBLR Act and evidence of non-payment of rent by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1 series
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence for the sending of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence that the respondent received the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs Jayaprakash.T.K regarding enhancement of rent
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs Jayaprakash.T.K regarding enhancement of rent

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 10/23/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mr.Ferose VP vs Mr.Waseem Thondikodan regarding eviction
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Jubairiya et al vs Valiyaveetu Parambil Hamsakoya regarding eviction from leased shop room
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won