Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.519/2012

Case between Suresh Babu vs Rajendran Nair et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration
Case Code No.
519
Case Closed
Mon, 09/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Suresh Babu was absent during the proceedings, and the second defendant Subash Babu was represented. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to appear despite notice.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The court found no reason to proceed with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The court found no reason to proceed with the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear in court despite being notified.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear in court despite being notified.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent, no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find no reason to proceed with the suit. Suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suresh Babu
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajendran Nair
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subash Babu
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.R.Balakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S.Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit stands dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence I find no reason to proceed with the suit. Suit stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 09/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won