Case Summary
The petitioner, Surendra Kuruppu, filed a restoration petition. The petition was rejected due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the petition due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not properly represented.
The petition was not properly represented.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not properly represented.
The petition was not properly represented.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent. No representation. No steps taken for affixture.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Surendra Kuruppu
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soumya
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Jayakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Surendra Kuruppu vs Soumya regarding restoration of petition
Case Code Year
Case between Surendra Kuruppu vs Soumya regarding restoration of petition