Case Summary
The plaintiffs, led by Sunil. G, were involved in a suit against the defendants, Sajith Kumar and others. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
As plaintiff is absent and no representation made suit dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunil. G
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunitha
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suma
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajith Kumar
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ratheesh
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekumar
- Party Age
- 38
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Thirumala K.Bijukumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vellayani V.P.Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is absent and no representation made suit dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunil. G et al vs Sajith Kumar et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Sunil. G et al vs Sajith Kumar et al regarding dismissal of suit.