Case Summary
Sumi Achamma Mathew is the plaintiff, and the defendants are Jijo P.J Sam and Anlet Thankam. The case involves the rejection of a suit due to the non-payment of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to non-payment of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
The court found that the plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
The court found that the plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff failed to remit the required balance court fee.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee even though directed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sumi Achamma Mathew
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jijo P.J Sam
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anlet Thankam
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. J. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Balamurali.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee even though directed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sumi Achamma Mathew vs Jijo P.J Sam et al regarding court fee payment
Case Code Year
Case between Sumi Achamma Mathew vs Jijo P.J Sam et al regarding court fee payment