Case Summary
The case involves Sujatha and others as plaintiffs against Vijayakumar, the defendant. The plaintiffs are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and are contesting the defendant's application to produce documents at a belated stage.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application to accept documents produced by the defendant. The court reasoned that the plaintiffs would still have sufficient opportunity to cross-examine regarding the documents.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA stands allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sujatha
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ambika
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohanan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudha
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh Kumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayakumar
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.P.Jayachandran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The application to accept documents produced from the side of the defendants was allowed.
Evidence:
In the result, IA stands allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Documents were produced from the side of the defendant to substantiate their case.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sujatha et al vs Vijayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sujatha et al vs Vijayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction