Case Summary
The petitioners, including Suharabi and others, sought a remedy related to rent control against the respondent K.P. Sunil Kumar. The case was abated because the petitioners did not take steps to implead the legal representatives of the respondent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court abated the case due to the petitioners' inaction in impleading the legal representatives of the respondent.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
So RCP is abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suharabi
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramlabi
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shereefa
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asheera @ Haseena
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thesleena
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.P. Sunil Kumar
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.K. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vandana Venugopalan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.K. Sreedharan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P
Case Code Year
2020