Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P 64/2023

Case between Suja Babu et al vs Ajith Kumar.E.V et al regarding Rent Control.

Court
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha.T.P
Order Date
2025-05-19
Duration
Case Code No.
64
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the petitioners Suja Babu, Sreedhar.M. Menon, K. Fahad, and Fadiya Shamjith against the respondents Ajith Kumar.E.V and Krishnadas regarding matters of rent control. The petition was reported to be settled between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition has been resolved, resulting in the RCP being dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition has been resolved, resulting in the RCP being dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Matter settled between the parties. RCP is not pressed by the counsel for the petitioners. Hence RCP is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suja Babu
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreedhar.M. Menon
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Fahad
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fadiya Shamjith
Party Age
30
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajith Kumar.E.V
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnadas
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Rajilesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P. Gangadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.C. Satheesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
RCP is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Matter settled between the parties. RCP is not pressed by the counsel for the petitioners. Hence RCP is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Suja Babu et al vs Hamsa Koya et al regarding Rent control matter
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Suja Babu et al vs P.S. Sivaram regarding Rent Control
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Suja Babu et al vs Ayishabi Kadakkalakam et al regarding Rent Control
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between P. Ahammed Saithu Muhammed et al vs T. Druvan regarding Rent Control
Munsiff-II Court, Kozhikode
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Kannankai Kadeesa et al vs Mullaveettil Sakeer Hussain regarding Rent Control
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Plaintiff Won