Case Summary
Sudharani N. is the plaintiff and Dr. K. Sasidharan is the defendant. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff, and all interim applications were also dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and counsel reported no instruction.
The plaintiff was absent and counsel reported no instruction.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and counsel reported no instruction.
The plaintiff was absent and counsel reported no instruction.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and counsel reported no instruction.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. All IAs are stand dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudharani N.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dr. K. Sasidharan
- Party Age
- 64
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.P. Surendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pravitha P.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Subin K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudharani N. vs Dr. K. Sasidharan regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Sudharani N. vs Dr. K. Sasidharan regarding suit dismissal for default.