Case Summary
Vilasini Manammal filed a suit against Shyma and Kripaladas for eviction and compensation due to unauthorised use and occupation. The case was heard in the presence of the plaintiff's advocate.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vilasini Manammal
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shyma
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kripaladas
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.P.Sreenesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought eviction and compensation for unauthorized use and occupation.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vilasini Manammal vs Shyma et al regarding eviction and compensation for unauthorised use and occupation.
Case Code Year
Case between Vilasini Manammal vs Shyma et al regarding eviction and compensation for unauthorised use and occupation.