Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank of India represented by its Senior Manager against Naizamuddin.S. The plaint was rejected by the court due to the absence of remitted court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of balance court fee and no application filed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected based on the procedural grounds of not remitting the court fee.
The plaint was rejected based on the procedural grounds of not remitting the court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected based on the procedural grounds of not remitting the court fee.
The plaint was rejected based on the procedural grounds of not remitting the court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of remitted court fees.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Naizamuddin.S
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
No documents mentioned
Defendants Documents
No documents mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Jayaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Bipin K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected due to no balance court fee remitted and no application filed.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Naizamuddin.S regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Naizamuddin.S regarding plaint rejection