Case Summary
The State Bank of India, represented by its Branch Manager, filed a suit against Mahalekshmi R. The court ultimately rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and unpaid court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and had not paid the necessary court fees, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not pay court fees.
Plaintiff was absent and did not pay court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not pay court fees.
Plaintiff was absent and did not pay court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Balance court fee not seen paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mahalekshmi R
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anupriyadarsini. P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025