Case Summary
The State Bank of India represented by its Branch Manager filed a suit against Mukesh Kumar for an unspecified matter. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made. Therefore, the case was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Supporting Evidence
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit stands posted for exparte evidence. As plaintiff is absent and no representation is made out stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India, Vikas Bhavan Branch
- Relation
- represented by its Branch Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mukesh Kumar.V
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Lakshmi.L
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed due to plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is absent and no representation is made out stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India, Vikas Bhavan Branch vs Mukesh Kumar.V regarding exparte dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India, Vikas Bhavan Branch vs Mukesh Kumar.V regarding exparte dismissal of suit