Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1529/2023

Case between State Bank Of India et al vs G.Sukumaran regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
Case Code No.
1529
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank Of India, represented by its manager, against G.Sukumaran regarding a suit that was not pressed. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed by the court because the plaintiff's counsel filed a memo indicating that they do not wish to press the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed by the court because the plaintiff's counsel filed a memo indicating that they do not wish to press the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank Of India
Relation
represented its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G.Sukumaran
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.K.Ajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vishnu Sri.Hari.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Premjith.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.David
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Varghese Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Dhanya.U.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Renganathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won