Case Summary
The petitioners, represented by their secretary and treasurer, are seeking possession of a building from the respondent. The court found that the respondent did not provide an explanation for non-compliance with a previous order.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner to be put in possession of the building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the respondent must give possession of the building to the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not file a review or appeal.
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not file a review or appeal.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not file a review or appeal.
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order and did not file a review or appeal.
Supporting Evidence
No explanation seen furnished by respondent for non compliance of order in IA3/24 dated 14/08/2025. No review petition seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of petition scheduled building u/s.12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- St. Thomas Evangelical Fellowship of India
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reverend Joy Mathew
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sri. P P Kurien
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jose Panachikkal Peter
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. N. Gopalakrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition scheduled building.
Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of petition scheduled building u/s.12(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between St. Thomas Evangelical Fellowship of India et al vs Jose Panachikkal Peter regarding possession of petition scheduled building
Case Code Year
Case between St. Thomas Evangelical Fellowship of India et al vs Jose Panachikkal Peter regarding possession of petition scheduled building