Case Summary
The case involves S.Sobhana as the petitioner and Sreenath along with other defendants regarding a request for a commission to ascertain property-related disputes. The court allowed the application for a commission to clarify these matters.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
IA is allowed and a commission is appointed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application for appointing an advocate commissioner to assess property-related disputes. The applicant, S.Sobhana, is required to deposit fees to facilitate this process.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The applicant made out a prima facie case for the commission.
The applicant made out a prima facie case for the commission.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The applicant made out a prima facie case for the commission.
The applicant made out a prima facie case for the commission.
Supporting Evidence
The applicant has made out a prima facie case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the application and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S.Sobhana
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o Madhusoodanan.V.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreenath
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o K.Viswanathan Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Madhusoodhanan
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o Viswambaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karthika.M.L.
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o Madhusoodanan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kavitha.M.L.
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o Madhusoodanan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Anoop Rajendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.B.Vasudevan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court allowed the application for further inquiries into the matter.
Evidence:
Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the application and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Appointment of an advocate commissioner and surveyor.
Evidence:
Advocate Smt.Manjila Viswakarma is appointed as the advocate commissioner and Sri.Sajeev.O.S is appointed as the surveyor to assist the advocate commissioner.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Direction for the applicant to deposit batta for the advocate commissioner and surveyor.
Evidence:
The applicant is directed to deposit batta of Rs.4,500/- to the advocate commissioner and Rs.3,000/- to the surveyor within 30 days.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The commission report filed by the advocate commissioner states the need for a surveyor's assistance to clarify property ownership.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between S.Sobhana vs Sreenath et al regarding IA.No.6/2025
Case Code Year
Case between S.Sobhana vs Sreenath et al regarding IA.No.6/2025