Case Summary
S.Sharabhudeen filed a Rent Control petition against Arshad.M.A. The petitioner was absent during the proceedings, and the court dismissed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S.Sharabhudeen
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arshad.M.A
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Muhamad Shah.M.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abhilash.N.G.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.R.Rajakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2023