Case Summary
Nisha filed a petition against P.Ramesan concerning a rental dispute. The petition was eventually dismissed as the matter was settled and the petitioner did not wish to proceed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as the parties had settled the matter and the petitioner did not intend to proceed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nisha
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.Ramesan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Deed dated 01/02/2021, Rent Deed dated 01/02/2022
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dilmohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petitioner is not intending to proceed with the petition.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner submitted that matter is settled and petitioner is not intending to proceed with the petition.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024