Case Summary
The plaintiff is South Indian Bank represented by its Manager. The defendant is Binshad. A, who is exparte in the proceedings regarding a suit about balance court fee and pre-trial steps.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit based on the absence of the defendant and the argument presented for balance court fee and pre-trial steps.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- South Indian Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binshad. A
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
N/A
Defendants Documents
N/A
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Niyas. A. Salam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit is rejected.
Evidence:
So this court is of the view that no further time need be granted. Hence the suit is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between South Indian Bank vs Binshad. A regarding balance court fee and pre-trial steps.
Case Code Year
Case between South Indian Bank vs Binshad. A regarding balance court fee and pre-trial steps.