Case Summary
The petitioners, Souda and others, are seeking to recover possession of a shop room from the respondent, N.P. Noushad, due to unpaid rent arrears. The court has ordered the respondent to vacate the premises based on non-compliance with previous orders regarding rent payment.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order for the respondent to vacate the premises within one month.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has determined that the respondent has failed to comply with earlier orders regarding payment of rent arrears. As a result, the court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with previous orders to pay rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with previous orders to pay rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with previous orders to pay rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with previous orders to pay rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore this court is of the view that the respondent failed to comply with the order in I.A.1/2023 and failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the Rent Control Petition and directed the respondents to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room within one month from today.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Souda
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Moorppala Veettil Muhammed Yasin
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Moorppala Veettil Shabana
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Moorppala Veettil Hanil Sajjad
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N.P. Noushad
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.N. Sreenivasan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akhila P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N. Shamsudhin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Respondents to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room.
Evidence:
Hence, an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the Rent Control Petition and directed the respondents to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room within one month from today.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Souda et al vs N.P. Noushad regarding rent arrears and possession.
Case Code Year
Case between Souda et al vs N.P. Noushad regarding rent arrears and possession.