Case Summary
S.Madhavan Pillai is the petitioner seeking possession of a building from Subramanyan.A, the counter petitioner. The court stopped further proceedings since the respondent did not comply with previous orders.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner is granted possession of the building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the respondent must put the petitioner in possession of the building as requested since there was no compliance with the previous orders. Further proceedings in the case were stopped.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not provide any explanation for non-compliance of the previous order.
The respondent did not provide any explanation for non-compliance of the previous order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not provide any explanation for non-compliance of the previous order.
The respondent did not provide any explanation for non-compliance of the previous order.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent has not seen furnished any explanation for non-compliance of the order in IA 2/24 dated 30/01/2025.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the Plaint schedule building u/s 12(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S.Madhavan Pillai
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subramanyan.A
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Kowdiar S Mohandas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Mridul John Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Bimal.V.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sheeba Nath.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the Plaint schedule building.
Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the Plaint schedule building u/s 12(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2023