Case Summary
The plaintiffs are Shobha and Soumya, while the defendants are Viayakumari, Aswin, and Akshay. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs and defendants were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs did not appear in court, nor did they file any proof affidavit. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs' absence and failure to provide evidence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiffs' absence and failure to provide evidence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No evidence adduced.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shobha
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Soumya
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Viayakumari
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aswin
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akshay
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Vikraman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thonnakkal G.Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shobha vs Viayakumari et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Shobha vs Viayakumari et al regarding default dismissal of suit.