Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1053/2023

Case between Shiras Majeed vs Sulaikha Majeed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Shiras Majeed, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants regarding property ownership issues. The defendants are alleged to have interfered with the plaintiff's rights over the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed, restraining the first defendant from alienating the property and the other defendants from trespassing. The plaintiff is entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed, restraining the first defendant from alienating the property and the other defendants from trespassing. The plaintiff is entitled to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved ownership and possession of the property through unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved ownership and possession of the property through unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the oral and documentary evidence adduced from the side of plaintiff, the plaintiffs’ ownership and possession over the plaint A schedule property is proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (i) The 1st defendant is restrained from alienating or transferring the plaint schedule property...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shiras Majeed
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sanjeed Hussain
Party Age
27
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaikha Majeed
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahul Hameed
Party Age
78
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheena Shahabudeen
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabitha Shaji
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreeja.V
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Certified Copy of Title Deed No. 5367/08, Tax Receipt, Building Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Radhakrishnan K. Pezhummoodu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the 1st defendant from alienating the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The 1st defendant is restrained from alienating or transferring the plaint schedule property and house therein or from doing any act which obstructs the plaintiff’s right over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants 2 to 7 from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants 2 to 7 are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property or house bearing TC.43/3 situates in the plaint schedule property or causing any damages into it or from doing any act which obstruct the plaintiff’s right over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances, the plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked to prove the authority of the plaintiff's representation.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Title Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim of the plaintiff regarding property taxes.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides additional evidence of the property owned by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shiras Majeed vs Sulaikha Majeed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Shiras Majeed vs Sulaikha Majeed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won