Case Summary
Shalini, the plaintiff, filed a restoration petition. The defendants are Kumar and Lekha.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by Shalini was dismissed for default due to her absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner did not take any steps to proceed with the case.
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner did not take any steps to proceed with the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner did not take any steps to proceed with the case.
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner did not take any steps to proceed with the case.
Supporting Evidence
This court has given repeated opportunities to the petitioner to take steps. Eventhen no steps taken.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shalini
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kumar
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lekha
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Madavoor G.Sureshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shalini vs Kumar et al regarding Restoration Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Shalini vs Kumar et al regarding Restoration Petition