Case Summary
Shaiju.A filed a suit against Mubarak. The plaintiff failed to appear for the proceedings despite opportunities given, resulting in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's non-representation and failure to take further steps despite being given opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not represent the case and failed to follow through despite being given chances.
The plaintiff did not represent the case and failed to follow through despite being given chances.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not represent the case and failed to follow through despite being given chances.
The plaintiff did not represent the case and failed to follow through despite being given chances.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff no representation. No fresh steps further despite opportunity gives.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shaiju.A
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mubarak
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vamanapuram V.K.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shaiju.A vs Mubarak regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Shaiju.A vs Mubarak regarding suit dismissal for default