Case Summary
Scaria. K.P is the plaintiff and P.M. Tomy along with Thryesiyamma Tomy are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Scaria. K.P
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.M. Tomy
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thryesiyamma Tomy
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sudheesh Kumar. A. M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Lillykutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
The suit is listed for trial. Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Scaria. K.P vs P.M. Tomy et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Scaria. K.P vs P.M. Tomy et al regarding dismissal for default.