Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 415/2021

Case between Savithri K.M. et al vs M/s. Indus Towers Limited et al regarding suit dismissal

Court
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-08-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Savithri K.M. and others as plaintiffs against M/s. Indus Towers Limited and others as defendants. The plaintiff did not press the plaint, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the plaint during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the plaint during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Savithri K.M.
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Krishnadas M.
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baburaj K.
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Babu M.V.
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Govindan P.
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Indus Towers Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
District Telecom Committee
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kozhikode Corporation
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prajith Prashobh
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prajith Prajulesh
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. P. Mini
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt, Sareena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C.K. Madhusoodanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joju Cyriac
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.S. Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff not pressed the plaint.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Savithri K.M. et al vs M/s. Indus Towers Limited et al regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Savithri K.M. et al vs M/s. Indus Towers Limited et al regarding suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vilasini Manammal vs Shyma et al regarding eviction and compensation for unauthorised use and occupation.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE.
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Kalyan Engineering Corporation vs M/s. Mawsim Gold Private Ltd. regarding mediation agreement
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meenakshi vs Radha K.A. et al regarding mediation agreement
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank, Kakkodi Branch, et al vs Sanith P., Somasundaran M. regarding settlement of dispute.
The Court of the Additional Munsiff-I, Kozhikode
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Peradi Puthukudi Padmini Amma et al vs Kolappalli Kolasseri Abdulla regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Dismissed