Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 33/ 2021

Case between Sathyaseelan vs Sathyababu regarding restoration petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-12-03
Duration
approximately-4 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sathyaseelan is the petitioner seeking restoration in a case against Sathyababu. The court has considered the petition and allowed it on specific conditions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition on the condition of payment of costs. If the costs are not paid, the petition will be dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed on payment of costs of Rs.1000.
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition on the condition of payment of costs. If the costs are not paid, the petition will be dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found merit in allowing the petition for the petitioner to contest the matter on merits.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found merit in allowing the petition for the petitioner to contest the matter on merits.
Supporting Evidence
The court heard and perused the records. After considering the materials this court is of the view that, if this petition is not allowed, then the petitioner won't be able to contest the matter on merits.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is allowed on payment of costs of Rs.1000/- to the respondent within 7 days from today. In case of non-compliance, the petition stands dismissed automatically.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sathyaseelan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathyababu
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Navaikulam. S. Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Ayyappadas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed on payment of costs of Rs.1000/- to the respondent within 7 days from today.
Evidence:
Hence the petition can be allowed on costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sathyaseelan vs Sathyababu regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sathyaseelan vs Sathyababu regarding restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thomas vs St. Thomas Church Committee et al regarding restoration of file.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Subi vs District Collector et al regarding restoration of Original Suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sarasa.G et al vs Vikraman Unnithan et al regarding Restoration Petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Nandu et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between John Nirmal Thomas vs Mohanlal et al regarding restoration of the suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won