Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No 1394/2022

Case between Sasthri Sreenivasan@ Sree Sasthri vs Sreedevi et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-08-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Sasthri Sreenivasan, the plaintiff, against Sreedevi and others as defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation in court. The third defendant was present, but no proof affidavit was filed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation in court. The third defendant was present, but no proof affidavit was filed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear and provide necessary representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear and provide necessary representation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed. Pronounced in open court on this the 16th day of August 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasthri Sreenivasan@ Sree Sasthri
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreedevi
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sweety
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sree Durga
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Smt.K.S Leenachand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ravisankar. T.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.Sri.A.Jahangeer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.Smt.Shubha.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasthri Sreenivasan@ Sree Sasthri vs Sreedevi et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sasthri Sreenivasan@ Sree Sasthri vs Sreedevi et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won