Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 81/2022

Case between Saritha V.S et al vs P. Vijayakumar et al regarding rejection of plaint

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-08-01
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Saritha V.S, Mathew George, and George Das, are involved in a case against the defendants, P. Vijayakumar and Reshmi. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to remit the balance court fee as directed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their failure to remit the court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their failure to remit the court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiffs failed to appear and remit the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiffs failed to appear and remit the balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiffs failed to appear and remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saritha V.S
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mathew George
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George Das
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Vijayakumar
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reshmi
Party Age
42
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Jamuna Kumari Thankachy K.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rahmathullah.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint filed by the plaintiff was rejected.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saritha V.S et al vs P. Vijayakumar et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between Saritha V.S et al vs P. Vijayakumar et al regarding rejection of plaint

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won