Case Summary
This case involves a restoration petition filed by the 7th defendant, Leela, against the plaintiffs and other defendants. The petition was ultimately dismissed as abated because the petitioner is no more and no steps were taken to implead legal representatives.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as abated due to the petitioner's death and failure to implead legal representatives.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed as abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saraswathy
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreeraman
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thampi
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Maniyan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sivanandan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Leela
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
NIL
Defendants Documents
NIL
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.V.Shinu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Sri. P.S.Sureshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is dismissed as abated due to the petitioner being no more and no steps taken to implead legal representatives.
Evidence:
it is submitted that Petitioner is no more. No steps taken to implead legal representatives of the petitioner. Hence the petition is dismissed as abated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saraswathy et al vs Leela regarding petition dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Saraswathy et al vs Leela regarding petition dismissal