Case Summary
This case involves Saran Kumar.S as the plaintiff and Balakumar.S along with Ammini Amma as defendants. The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of court fee payment.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff did not appear and no court fee was paid.
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff did not appear and no court fee was paid.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff did not appear and no court fee was paid.
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff did not appear and no court fee was paid.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff did not appear and no balance court fee was remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saran Kumar.S
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balakumar.S
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ammini Amma
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Visakh.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Eshwar S.B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Rajeev.G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ajith Kumar.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saran Kumar.S vs Balakumar.S et al regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Saran Kumar.S vs Balakumar.S et al regarding plaint rejection