Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1023/2025

Case between Santhosh Kumar A P Kurup vs Manoharan Nair regarding property security.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Santhosh Kumar A P Kurup, has filed an application regarding potential alienation of property by the defendant, Manoharan Nair. The court is addressing the need for security to be furnished to prevent this from occurring.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to furnish security for the amount of Rs.2,58,214/- to prevent potential alienation of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of scheduled property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the defendant to furnish security for the amount of Rs.2,58,214/- to prevent potential alienation of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence suggesting the risk of property alienation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence suggesting the risk of property alienation.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the respondent in order to defeat the decree to be passed in the suit, is likely to alienate the property.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence issue notice to the respondent to furnish security for Rs.2,58,214/- (Rupees Two lakhs fifty eight thousand two hundred and fourteen only) or to show cause why security should not be furnished.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhosh Kumar A P Kurup
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manoharan Nair
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A.G.SyamKumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Rekha.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Akshaya.S.Ajayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gouri Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ken Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Conditional attachment of the scheduled property pending security for the amount specified.
Evidence:
Hence issue notice to the respondent to furnish security for Rs.2,58,214/- (Rupees Two lakhs fifty eight thousand two hundred and fourteen only) or to show cause why security should not be furnished. In the meantime, the scheduled property is conditionally attached.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Santhosh Kumar A P Kurup vs Manoharan Nair regarding property security.
Case Code Year
Case between Santhosh Kumar A P Kurup vs Manoharan Nair regarding property security.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won