Case Summary
The case involves plaintiffs Santhakumary and Bindu against the defendant A. James Fernandez regarding the rejection of a plaint for lack of court fee and proper application. The court found that no balance court fee was remitted and ruled on this matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of the court fee and failure to file an application. The court did not find any merit to allow the plaint to proceed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected based on the failure to remit the balance court fee as required by the law.
The plaint was rejected based on the failure to remit the balance court fee as required by the law.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No balance court fee seen remitted. No application filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhakumary
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bindu
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A. James Fernandez
- Party Age
- 72
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B. Vasudevan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Jayaprasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to no balance court fee remitted and no application filed.
Evidence:
No balance court fee seen remitted. No application filed. Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019