Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Sangeetha and Babitha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are the children and spouse of the late Sri. Karunakaran. The suit concerns the prevention of the defendants from executing any document related to specific properties that are in dispute.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application filed by the defendants for appointing an advocate commissioner was dismissed, as it was deemed unnecessary given the previous report detailing the properties. The court found no need for additional survey measurements.
Key Reasoning:
The relief sought by the defendants was denied as the previous commission report satisfied the requirements without the need for further measurements.
The relief sought by the defendants was denied as the previous commission report satisfied the requirements without the need for further measurements.
Why Defendant Won:
The relief sought by the defendants was denied as the previous commission report satisfied the requirements without the need for further measurements.
The relief sought by the defendants was denied as the previous commission report satisfied the requirements without the need for further measurements.
Supporting Evidence
It is not necessary to depute an advocate commissioner... Therefore the prayer of petitioner is liable to be rejected.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, I.A. is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sangeetha
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o Late Swaminathan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Babitha
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o Late Swaminathan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Anitha
- Relation
- W/o Janendra kumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Janendra kumar
- Relation
- H/o Mrs. Anitha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Ajitha
- Relation
- W/o Shanavas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shanavas
- Relation
- H/o Mrs Ajitha
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kala. N.L
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Laila Beevi. S.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Remya Gopalakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Lakshmi Ganesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Devika. D. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Prayer to appoint an advocate commissioner to measure the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
Therefore the prayer of petitioner is liable to be rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sangeetha et al vs Mrs. Anitha et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sangeetha et al vs Mrs. Anitha et al regarding injunction